推薦產(chǎn)品
3-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazole 2-(chloromethyl)-3-methylpyridinehydrochloride 1-(2-bromo-4-methylphenyl)ethanone 3-chloroisoquinoline-4-carbonitrile 5,8-dichloropyrido[3,2-d]pyridazine 2-bromomalononitrile 2-(4-(bromomethyl)phenyl)benzo[d]thiazole 1-(bromomethyl)-3-methoxy-2-nitrobenzene 6-bromo-1H-[1,2,3]triazolo[4,5-b]pyridine 4-iodo-2-((trimethylsilyloxy)methyl)thiazole 6-iodoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-carbonitrile 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-morpholinoacetonitrile 4-chloro-7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine 4-chloroisothiazole 5-bromo-6-chloro-1H-indole 7-chloro-3H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine ethyl3-(4-formylphenyl)propanoate 2,3-dibromobenzaldehyde 1-(5H-chromeno[2,3-b]pyridin-7-yl)ethanone 5H-chromeno[2,3-b]pyridin-5-one 3-chloroisoquinoline-4-carbaldehyde (E)-2-(3-oxoprop-1-enyl)benzaldehyde methyl4-formyl-3-nitrobenzoate 5,6-dimethoxy-2,2-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-one 1-methylbicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-3-one 3-nitro-4-(trifluoromethoxy)benzaldehyde 2-hydroxyquinoline-6-carbaldehyde 2-nitro-3-(trifluoromethyl)benzaldehyde 1-(2-fluoro-4-methoxyphenyl)propan-2-one tert-butyl3-fluoro-4-oxopiperidine-1-carboxylate tert-butyl3-oxopropylcarbamate 2,2-dimethylcyclohexanone 9H-carbazole-3-carbaldehyde N,N-dimethyl-2-oxoacetamide 2-methylpent-4-yn-2-ol 3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxybenzonitrile 4-bromo-2-tert-butylphenol 1,3-dibutoxypropan-2-ol methyl4-hydroxyquinoline-6-carboxylate methyl3-cyano-4-hydroxybenzoate 4-chloro-6-methoxyquinolin-7-ol 3,4-dihydro-2H-benzo[b][1,4]oxazin-7-ol 2-(2-aminothiazol-5-yl)ethanolhydrochloride (R)-ethyl2-chloropropanoate (S)-4-amino-5-(4,4-dimethylcyclohexylamino)-5-oxopentanoicacid (1s,4s)-4-hydroxycyclohexanecarboxylicacid (S)-2-(tetrahydrofuran-3-yloxy)aceticacid (1S,4R)-1-methyl-4-(prop-1-en-2-yl)cyclohex-2-enol (R)-4-(hydroxymethyl)oxazolidin-2-one (S)-4-(hydroxymethyl)oxazolidin-2-one 化工資訊 近日，世界衛(wèi)生組織國際癌癥研究機(jī)構(gòu)(IARC)主管Kurt Straif博士接受歐洲新聞訪問，重申草甘膦可能增加人類患癌這一觀點(diǎn)。
此前，國際癌癥研究機(jī)構(gòu)于2015年3月發(fā)表其研究結(jié)果，稱草甘膦是一種“可能的人類致癌物”，這引發(fā)了關(guān)于廣泛應(yīng)用除草劑-草甘膦的健康安全問題的爭論。而今年5月份，聯(lián)合國糧食與農(nóng)業(yè)組織(FAO)和世界衛(wèi)生組織(WHO)的另一監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)聯(lián)合發(fā)表了一份報(bào)告，指出草甘膦成分“不太可能通過飲食導(dǎo)致人類患癌風(fēng)險(xiǎn)增加”。
歐洲新聞主持人采訪中問到，作為普通民眾，WHO哪個(gè)研究機(jī)構(gòu)的報(bào)告更為可信？
Straif在訪談中表示，“我們的評(píng)估是由世界一流專家在所有關(guān)于草甘膦的研究上進(jìn)行的，評(píng)估結(jié)果與這些專家并無利益沖突。專家們評(píng)估草甘膦可能增加患癌風(fēng)險(xiǎn)主要基于三類證據(jù)，動(dòng)物實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果表明草甘膦使動(dòng)物患癌概率增大，一些報(bào)道指出接觸草甘膦的農(nóng)民患癌風(fēng)險(xiǎn)也有所增加，此外，毒理學(xué)研究結(jié)果表明草甘膦對生物基因也會(huì)造成損傷。就報(bào)告而言，我們是WHO全球癌癥物質(zhì)分類的權(quán)威，其他機(jī)構(gòu)僅從日常食品接觸的角度來考慮草甘膦是否安全并得出結(jié)論有些狹隘?！?/p>
可見，IARC的評(píng)估側(cè)重于“潛在威脅”(hazard)，而其他機(jī)構(gòu)側(cè)重于“風(fēng)險(xiǎn)”(risk)，關(guān)于這兩者的區(qū)別，加州大學(xué)河濱分校的毒理學(xué)家David Eastmond進(jìn)行了舉例說明：“在水族館看鯊魚有潛在威脅但風(fēng)險(xiǎn)很小。但在有鯊魚的海灘上沖浪，那么鯊魚對你既有潛在威脅也有風(fēng)險(xiǎn)?！?br />
