推薦產(chǎn)品
3-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazole 2-(chloromethyl)-3-methylpyridinehydrochloride 1-(2-bromo-4-methylphenyl)ethanone 3-chloroisoquinoline-4-carbonitrile 5,8-dichloropyrido[3,2-d]pyridazine 2-bromomalononitrile 2-(4-(bromomethyl)phenyl)benzo[d]thiazole 1-(bromomethyl)-3-methoxy-2-nitrobenzene 6-bromo-1H-[1,2,3]triazolo[4,5-b]pyridine 4-iodo-2-((trimethylsilyloxy)methyl)thiazole 6-iodoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-carbonitrile 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-morpholinoacetonitrile 4-chloro-7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine 4-chloroisothiazole 5-bromo-6-chloro-1H-indole 7-chloro-3H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine ethyl3-(4-formylphenyl)propanoate 2,3-dibromobenzaldehyde 1-(5H-chromeno[2,3-b]pyridin-7-yl)ethanone 5H-chromeno[2,3-b]pyridin-5-one 3-chloroisoquinoline-4-carbaldehyde (E)-2-(3-oxoprop-1-enyl)benzaldehyde methyl4-formyl-3-nitrobenzoate 5,6-dimethoxy-2,2-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-one 1-methylbicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-3-one 3-nitro-4-(trifluoromethoxy)benzaldehyde 2-hydroxyquinoline-6-carbaldehyde 2-nitro-3-(trifluoromethyl)benzaldehyde 1-(2-fluoro-4-methoxyphenyl)propan-2-one tert-butyl3-fluoro-4-oxopiperidine-1-carboxylate tert-butyl3-oxopropylcarbamate 2,2-dimethylcyclohexanone 9H-carbazole-3-carbaldehyde N,N-dimethyl-2-oxoacetamide 2-methylpent-4-yn-2-ol 3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxybenzonitrile 4-bromo-2-tert-butylphenol 1,3-dibutoxypropan-2-ol methyl4-hydroxyquinoline-6-carboxylate methyl3-cyano-4-hydroxybenzoate 4-chloro-6-methoxyquinolin-7-ol 3,4-dihydro-2H-benzo[b][1,4]oxazin-7-ol 2-(2-aminothiazol-5-yl)ethanolhydrochloride (R)-ethyl2-chloropropanoate (S)-4-amino-5-(4,4-dimethylcyclohexylamino)-5-oxopentanoicacid (1s,4s)-4-hydroxycyclohexanecarboxylicacid (S)-2-(tetrahydrofuran-3-yloxy)aceticacid (1S,4R)-1-methyl-4-(prop-1-en-2-yl)cyclohex-2-enol (R)-4-(hydroxymethyl)oxazolidin-2-one (S)-4-(hydroxymethyl)oxazolidin-2-one 化工資訊 2016年1—6月份，二連浩特口岸進(jìn)口木材61.9萬(wàn)噸、總值8.4億元，同比分別增長(zhǎng)15.8%和17.6%。其中，進(jìn)口原木12.4萬(wàn)噸、價(jià)值1.1億元，同比分別下降28.2%和32%；進(jìn)口板材49.5萬(wàn)噸、價(jià)值7.3億元，同比分別增長(zhǎng)36.6%和32.8%。
木材進(jìn)口呈現(xiàn)上述特點(diǎn)的主要原因有：一是俄羅斯出于保護(hù)本國(guó)森林資源及環(huán)保的考慮，采取控制和限制采伐量的措施，不斷上調(diào)原木出口關(guān)稅，對(duì)原木出口頻頻設(shè)限，征收懲罰性的出口關(guān)稅，同時(shí)鼓勵(lì)半加工木材和深加工木制品出口；二是我國(guó)作為木材消耗大國(guó)，同時(shí)又是林木資源相對(duì)短缺的國(guó)家，對(duì)木材進(jìn)口的依存度接近50%。為加快重點(diǎn)國(guó)有林區(qū)森林資源的恢復(fù)和培育，2014年4月，國(guó)家林業(yè)局下發(fā)了《關(guān)于切實(shí)做好全面停止商業(yè)性采伐試點(diǎn)工作的通知》，要求全面停止大興安嶺等林區(qū)的商業(yè)性采伐。為俄羅斯木材進(jìn)口提供了增長(zhǎng)空間。
