推薦產(chǎn)品
3-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazole 2-(chloromethyl)-3-methylpyridinehydrochloride 1-(2-bromo-4-methylphenyl)ethanone 3-chloroisoquinoline-4-carbonitrile 5,8-dichloropyrido[3,2-d]pyridazine 2-bromomalononitrile 2-(4-(bromomethyl)phenyl)benzo[d]thiazole 1-(bromomethyl)-3-methoxy-2-nitrobenzene 6-bromo-1H-[1,2,3]triazolo[4,5-b]pyridine 4-iodo-2-((trimethylsilyloxy)methyl)thiazole 6-iodoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-carbonitrile 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-morpholinoacetonitrile 4-chloro-7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine 4-chloroisothiazole 5-bromo-6-chloro-1H-indole 7-chloro-3H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine ethyl3-(4-formylphenyl)propanoate 2,3-dibromobenzaldehyde 1-(5H-chromeno[2,3-b]pyridin-7-yl)ethanone 5H-chromeno[2,3-b]pyridin-5-one 3-chloroisoquinoline-4-carbaldehyde (E)-2-(3-oxoprop-1-enyl)benzaldehyde methyl4-formyl-3-nitrobenzoate 5,6-dimethoxy-2,2-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-one 1-methylbicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-3-one 3-nitro-4-(trifluoromethoxy)benzaldehyde 2-hydroxyquinoline-6-carbaldehyde 2-nitro-3-(trifluoromethyl)benzaldehyde 1-(2-fluoro-4-methoxyphenyl)propan-2-one tert-butyl3-fluoro-4-oxopiperidine-1-carboxylate tert-butyl3-oxopropylcarbamate 2,2-dimethylcyclohexanone 9H-carbazole-3-carbaldehyde N,N-dimethyl-2-oxoacetamide 2-methylpent-4-yn-2-ol 3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxybenzonitrile 4-bromo-2-tert-butylphenol 1,3-dibutoxypropan-2-ol methyl4-hydroxyquinoline-6-carboxylate methyl3-cyano-4-hydroxybenzoate 4-chloro-6-methoxyquinolin-7-ol 3,4-dihydro-2H-benzo[b][1,4]oxazin-7-ol 2-(2-aminothiazol-5-yl)ethanolhydrochloride (R)-ethyl2-chloropropanoate (S)-4-amino-5-(4,4-dimethylcyclohexylamino)-5-oxopentanoicacid (1s,4s)-4-hydroxycyclohexanecarboxylicacid (S)-2-(tetrahydrofuran-3-yloxy)aceticacid (1S,4R)-1-methyl-4-(prop-1-en-2-yl)cyclohex-2-enol (R)-4-(hydroxymethyl)oxazolidin-2-one (S)-4-(hydroxymethyl)oxazolidin-2-one 化工資訊 10月25日，國家棉花市場監(jiān)測系統(tǒng)河北衡水監(jiān)測站對新年度當(dāng)?shù)孛藁óa(chǎn)量進行了調(diào)查，接受調(diào)查的棉戶共41家，結(jié)果顯示，單產(chǎn)低于8月份預(yù)測水平，僅比上年度略有提高。
截至目前，當(dāng)?shù)刈衙薏烧室殉?5%，棉株上所剩秋桃寥寥無幾，接受調(diào)查的農(nóng)戶平均采摘籽棉400斤/畝，若算上未采摘的，籽棉產(chǎn)量接近或略超過500斤/畝。經(jīng)統(tǒng)計分析，接受調(diào)查的所有農(nóng)戶中，單產(chǎn)在460-540斤/畝，加權(quán)平均值505.2斤/畝，僅比上年度高出3.2斤/畝，比今年8月份預(yù)期水平低30斤/畝。
之所以新年度當(dāng)?shù)孛藁▎萎a(chǎn)出現(xiàn)上述情況，主要有以下方面原因：一是9月底以前當(dāng)?shù)靥鞖鉅顩r比較適合棉花生長，加之病蟲害輕微發(fā)生，棉花長勢較好；二是10月初當(dāng)?shù)爻掷m(xù)降雨，且雨勢較大，中后期籽棉的產(chǎn)量和質(zhì)量受到影響；三是自開秤以來，籽棉收購價連續(xù)走低，目前保持在3.40-3.50元/斤，較開秤價下降0.20-0.30元/斤，也較上年度籽棉收購價格降低，棉農(nóng)覺得不劃算，疏于對中后期的棉花田間管理，不如9月底以前那樣上心了。
按單產(chǎn)500斤/畝計算，預(yù)計2017/18年度衡水市的籽棉總產(chǎn)量達25萬噸，較上年度增加25%，其中植棉面積的增加是當(dāng)?shù)匦履甓让藁偖a(chǎn)量增加的最大推手。
